tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7703856341303488608.post8225780797852239671..comments2024-03-17T00:00:13.417+00:00Comments on The Wertzone: Command and Conquer 3: Tiberium WarsAdam Whiteheadhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11383677312079611311noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7703856341303488608.post-66868969829050735032011-04-27T13:18:16.808+00:002011-04-27T13:18:16.808+00:00I've spent a LOT of time playing PC games, but...I've spent a LOT of time playing PC games, but not played a lot of games (compared to many). I find something I like and stick to it. So as far as RTS goes I played Age of Empires (2&3) to death and then I moved on to this and played it to death too. I really got into the online 1 on 1 version and became pretty good at it. <br /><br />Given my limited experience I can't talk about its strengths and weaknesses in the context of what else is out there - but for me it was a great game with plenty of depth and considerable thought put into the balance.<br /><br />I also played Call of Duty MW2 to death (I saw the review of its precursor). In both cases the single player version occupied probably 0.1% of the time I spent on it (I played both C&C3 & CoD MW2 single player through) - I enjoyed both single player games, but they felt like training for the 'real thing'. <br /><br />Until these two games I never really played online & was always irritated by reviews that dismissed the SP and spent forever on the MP ... so I appreciate your focus here - but also note that these games can be viewed in two very different ways. Certainly I would feel robbed if I bought CoD MW2 as a single player (too short + other issues) & with C&C3 would share your scoring. As multi-player experiences I would rank them highly and still don't regret the stupidly large hole they put in my spare time :)Mark Lawrencehttp://www.princeofthorns.com/noreply@blogger.com